35 Comments

“WHO controls the past controls the future. WHO controls the present controls the past.”

―George Orwell, “1984”

Expand full comment

How any sensible person could look at this and think it is a good idea is beyond me. People don't know about it or understand the extent of the powers. That needs to change. We need massive media coverage. The MPs are useless. They will go whichever way the wind blows, so we have to change the direction of the wind. Which is public opinion.

Expand full comment
author

That is why I write this stuff--to try to inform people, in as much as I can, about things such as IHR and before that the evidence around eg masks, pcr tests, school closures ,harms etc. I just hope that others pass it round eg Twitter,Facebook etc. I did post it on my Twitter, but......hardly Russell Brand!

Expand full comment

Hey Hugh, don't diminish what you're doing. It's so important. Sometimes one voice shouting in the void gets heard and that's all you need to turn it around. Keep shouting!

Thank you!!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for your encouragement.

Expand full comment
Mar 29, 2023Liked by Hugh McCarthy

Keep up the fantastic work Hugh, great job.

Expand full comment
Mar 24, 2023Liked by Hugh McCarthy

YES!!!

Expand full comment
Mar 25, 2023Liked by Hugh McCarthy

In the future politicians should be elected based on their position regarding the sovereignty of their country towards the global entities like UN, UE, WHO, WEF to name the least.

Expand full comment

"The MPs are useless." As is the censorious media, SM, virtue signalling woke captured corporations, bureaucracies, and institutions.

Decentralized, blockchain-based Internet any one?

Expand full comment
author

I think the process imprisons the good ones.

Expand full comment
Mar 23, 2023Liked by Hugh McCarthy

Oh my. Stumbled upon this. 2 min. https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cp-Rck7rWV7/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Expand full comment
author

scary

Expand full comment

Like many, I was sickened and disgusted by the scenes in the H.O.C when Andrew Bridgen stood up. Westminster is broken. Democracy is broken. The media is broken. The financial system is broken. Every damn thing to attempt to do to better things - you are 'channelled' into something, somewhere designed to stop you. As a lifelong horticulturalist - this situation reminds me of the importance of good, deep, rich, fertile soil in which all things will flourish. If you persistently dig down 20cm and 'clang' you hit nothing but seam after seam of toxic rubble - nothing will grow properly. On the surface it looks fine. We're no longer able to trust 'what we see' scarcely anywhere on the 'surface'. The French are right to take to the streets. I wish them luck. They'll certainly need it. It's a pity our 'king' isn't going. Perhaps he's more than well aware the regimes he's been knee-deep in all his life have bought that country to that point. Maybe that's the real reason he's staying away? His security will erase any personal threat. His eyes and his ears won't erase out of his mind what he knows he's helped to manifest.

Expand full comment
author

A very good analogy---nothing is what it seems.

Non compliance or France.....though reading some of the replies, maybe France is what "they" want.

Expand full comment

Very possibly. It is (and always has been) - as I'm sure you know - a 'right to protest' enshrined in French statute. What is uplifting though is the young age of those taking their frustration out onto the street. Not smashing things up - not setting fire to things (in the main), but just saying "we've had enough of this crap". The young are important. Whilst it's a bunch of moaning old buggers my age - the old order will say: "Hey. let them get on with it - very soon they'll need some Voltarol and will slope off home for a nap". But - when it's the young not falling for the bullshit - that's harder to ignore.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, I remain very disappointed at the compliance and belief of the younger generation here. In my youth it was the young you sought change---rock and roll, protests for civil rights in the Sorbonne,N.I and the Vietnam War. I couldn't believe how much my sons complied. Mind you my generation-a generation brought up with protest and the quest for freedom were largely just as compliant.

Expand full comment

It's most likely our UK government will sign the new treaty as it appears we are already in bed with Tedros and have been for a number of years.

https://frankreport.com/2020/04/14/the-ethiopian-terrorist-in-charge-of-the-world-health-organization-dr-tedros-adhanom/

Expand full comment
author

I never know whether to hit the like button--for something I don't like! Sadly you may be right.

Non compliance is the only answer.

Expand full comment
Mar 23, 2023·edited Mar 23, 2023

Ummm Andrew Mitchell, a paragon of behavioural rectitude....why was he sanctioned - I remember, he accused the Police guarding Downing Street of being plebs...he might be judged as prescient given the Mets ingrained problems but then again he might just be the embodiment of privileged, public school educated oiks who have screwed over the UK most pointedly since late 2019.

Expand full comment
author

or done so deliberately.

Expand full comment
Mar 23, 2023Liked by Hugh McCarthy

I was trying not to jump to conclusions ...... hell, if it quacks...

Expand full comment
Mar 27, 2023Liked by Hugh McCarthy

All very worrying

Expand full comment
author

and do try to read David Bell's articles referenced in my article..

Expand full comment
Mar 24, 2023Liked by Hugh McCarthy

Thank you for this - very worrying. It needs more publicity. Maybe a petition about it would mean it gets a debate in parliament, which might attract more attention.

Expand full comment

This is why history is not taught in schools anymore. There would be the largest public outcry if anyone actually understood what this means. Of course, we do, but NONE of this is going to reach somewhere around 50% of the US population. Even if it did, would they understand enough to realize what it means?

"...we empower governments to protect us in a devil’s bargain from which we will lose in the long run." - Benjamin Wittes

This was WELL understood by our founders. That was the whole point of decentralized government. Now the WHO wants to wrangle the entire world into ONE GOVERNMENT!

We need more people to stand guard, and stop this nonsense, before we're not ALLOWED to speak unkindly of it...

Expand full comment

I surely understand your sentiments here, and you name well my default feeling! That said, I challenge us (and myself) to begin speaking more along the lines of sentiments such as, "This will soon reach EVERYONE in the US, and this knowledge will change the course of the whole world in an unbelievably wonderful way!"

Expand full comment

That's why I keep putting truth out there. All that needs to happen is enough people start looking around, and this whole thing falls apart.

The entire WEF Great Reset, FTW operation is built on a house of cards. This is made evident by the fact that media control is critical to their desired outcome. The fact that the truth must be avoided is a good sign, at least, a hopeful sign for the future.

Expand full comment

Reading along...and I caught your name. Hoping you have some tips in growing them. Fresh raspberries, that is.

Expand full comment
Mar 24, 2023Liked by Hugh McCarthy

Will resist to my last breath, and that is exactly what they want. People dying quicker. You resist their tyranny and the will murder you by force. You submit to their terrorism and they will drug you to death. They must be gone, gone, gone. Completely defunded.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you

Expand full comment

Is this real? Will the WHO be able to force pharmaceuticals into individuals? That would be hugely unethical. Very concerning, very dystopian.

Expand full comment
author

I can only read the words. I also listened to a presentation by David Bell who is a member of the academic board of the Brownstone Institute and of Pandata, he is also a former Director of WHO. you might read those articles I posted with mine. It is about to be "debated" in the UK parliament for what that means.

Expand full comment

Who controls the world is a similar question to who owns the world & who owns the world is a subject into while I have delved since I came across the truly remarkable twin stories of the Canadian Genocide of Children, & the Kamloops Kidnapping of 1964.

So I hope you'll excuse me if I tear off down this tangent, hopefully briefly.

First, a quick recap of the Canadian Genocide. The worlds most hated internet individual, ex-preacher Kevin Annett, started his clergy work in Canada in the 90's. He was immediately struck by the distinct lack of indigenous attendees to his sermons & went about some quiet inquiries before being told that the local residential school (aka Christian Death Camp) residents (aka inmates!) had suffered a number of "experiences" at the hands of local bigwigs who attended Annett's church & refused for obvious reasons to attend with them. Shall we say for the sake of brevity & for the sake of the stomachs of those reading that these experiences were of the negative sort. Abuse, paedophilia, murder, etc.

Annett further discovered his church was parcelling out indigenous land, apparently held in "trust" for the indigenous locals, to local mining & logging firms, selling it off illegally. It was his attempts to expose this affront that brought his removal from the church & he has remained an enduring & detested thorn in their side ever since.

Annett wrote books & even produced a documentary on the abuses in Canadian residential schools. Later, an official Canadian Truth & Reconciliation Commission reported that as many as 5000 children had died, mostly thanks to TB according to the official narrators, a figure said by Annett & others to be at least ten-to-twenty times too low. At least 50 000 to 100 000 Canadian indigenous children died whilst being forced to attend the Christian Death Camps.

Annett not only produced documentary evidence & wrote books but he also presented a radio show through which he met a William Coombes. Coombes told a story even more remarkable & barely any more believable than the Genocide of Canadian Children in the first place.

Whilst inmate at Kamloops residential school in 1964, Coombes claims his school was visited by Elizabeth the queen of England with her husband, Prince Philip, during their first official Canadian visit. Coombes claims he was forced to attend a picnic with the couple during which ten children of varying ages & sexes, but all amongst the "smarter" kids, were separated from the group & taken away by the queen & Philip. Coombes says none were ever seen again, & asking after them brought severe beatings & a week in solitary confinement. Coombes never forgot the missing kids & one day he brought up the subject on Annett's radio show. Later, not long before he was expected to visit the UK to make an official complaint of some sort, Coombes died in hospital & a nurse witness to his demise claims he was medically murdered.

So, let's get back to who controls/owns the world. The royals do. Canada is the second largest country on earth, second only to Russia. (remember that by the way as the west ramps up it's proxy war in Ukraine!). But almost 90% of Canada is designated "Crown Land". Can you guess who might have chosen such a moniker? Bingo. They don't call it crown land for nothing. So almost 90% of Canada is owned by the royal family & is apparently held in trust for indigenous Canadians who just happen to be amongst the poorest people on our planet & whose women continue to endure extreme, racial violence & murder rates.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/canada-genocide-murdered-missing-women-girls-indigenous-inquiry-report-a8939646.html

But it's not just Canada. The royals hold "Crown Land" in much of Australia & New Zealand. They also hold land in numerous island area's, both near to the UK & far further afield. Jersey, centre of the Haut de la Garenne children's home abuse scandal, is a Crown Protectorate, it is neither a part of the UK nor a part of the EU. Jersey is also amongst Europe's wealthiest off-shore tax-havens, rivalling Switzerland.

By comparison, Russia is not owned by any Russian royals (obviously) but is owned by the Russian people. Most other countries are similar, owned by their people rather than a privileged royal elite.

By far the largest single landowners on earth are the British royal family.

So the question Who Controls The World is actually answered by the question Who Owns The World. They do, the British royal family. Now that old Maj is gone, her pervert son, lifelong mates with Britain's most notorious & well protected abuser of mostly women & female kids, Jimmy Savile, is next in line. Comforting.

Just some supportive links to follow.

"The world’s primary feudal landowner is Queen Elizabeth II. She is Queen of 32 countries, head of a Commonwealth of 54 countries in which a quarter of the world’s population lives, and legal owner of about 6.6 billion acres of land, one-sixth of the earth’s land surface. Her position is a relic of the last and largest land empire in history, rumours of whose demise would appear to be somewhat premature based on her position and possessions. But her power is real, or at least legally real, and it derives from a tradition based on a specific and unbalanced relationship between rulers and the ruled."

You'll need a log-in the read the rest, which was obviously written when the old queen was still with us. - https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2017/03/land-queen-world-australia

"The story of William Coombes is described in this book. Coombes survived the residential schools system in Canada that killed &/or "disappeared" at least 50 000 children from the late 1880's. Not even the Nazi's targeted children directly & it's no coincidence that the phrase "The Final Solution" was coined not by the Germans of the 30's but by Canadians seeking to resolve what they called "The Indian Problem". Christian Death Camps for Aboriginal Indian kids were the chosen method of resolving "The Indian Problem". These schools never sought to educate, they sought to annihilate. The plan was to Genocide not educate, in other words.

William Coombes was resident at Kamloops & Mission Indian residential school (Christian Death Camp) in Kamloops, British Columbia in Canada in 1964 when his school was visited by the Queen & Prince Phillip. Coombes claims that after taking the kids on a "picnic" down to Dead Mans Creek, ten of his classmates were separated from the group & taken away by the Queen & Prince Philip. None of these children were ever seen again & none of them ever returned from wherever the queen of England took them..."

Coombes Kamloops Kidnapping as told by Annett can be seen in images of the books pages here - https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/customer-reviews/R1VUSL8Y2H1HOT/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl

The Kamloops Kidnapping as told in this clip taken from a doc about the royals - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AANMnpCjgxY

Coombes himself briefly describes the 1964 incident - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q74ZiOt37cQ

The nurse who believes she witnessed Coombes murder - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfhVnlYt5sk

Annett's 1990's doc on the Canadian Genocide. For those with strong stomachs only! - https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=kevin+annett+documentary&view=detail&mid=0273CC66B61DFE77C5340273CC66B61DFE77C534&FORM=VIRE

Thanks for reading, anyone who has not subscribed, please do :)

Expand full comment

Don't be fooled, Bridgen's parliment speech was propaganda theater, you have to listen to it carefully:

https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/switch-a-roo-in-the-uk-parliament

Expand full comment