With covid waning, and the common cold becoming the winter bug it always was, why would anyone give a child an experimental biological, for a “virus” with a one in two million IFR? Over a million adverse events reported and thousands of death, VAERS CDC.
"WE" aren't vaccinating babies: you & all the other cowards would rather risk Every Baby in order to avoid taking on any adult responsibility.
The entire point of constitutional law is to prevent any small group of people ESPECIALLY elected leaders from having the power to mandate anything, ever. Those laws are still in place, 100% accessible to the public.
The mainstream news even reminded us all for two straight years that no one, not even the U.S. president is exempt from or above these laws. So what keeps you from using this social media forum to mount a legal, non-violent movement to amass public support too large for anyone to stop? Don't bring ME into this "Why are 'WE' vaccinating babies" crap!
I do not worship or fear a single scumbag corrupt politician. I have tried several times to enlist the help of you & thousands of others in an effort to do the above.
& every time YOU ALL back away from it. One can MILLIONS of you cowards to bomb babies overseas for any variety of excuses.
But not one of you will ACT to save One Child's Life if it means having to have a backbone.
Well, this is how safe they have been for American adults and all other countries which rubber stamped the synthetic mRNA vaccines, which are patented, so we can expect the same results, probably for babies too: There were no COVID-19 vaccines close to approval on August 27, 2020. In fact, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine trial phase 2/3 had only started a month earlier on July 27.
The Initial Contract with General Dynamics
The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020. It outlines a series of services the company was to provide to the CDC pursuant to the “anticipated increase” in VAERS reports due to the COVID-19 vaccines.
There is no clause in the contract giving the CDC an option to cancel or suspend the contract in the event that vaccines would not be authorized. Also, the contract stipulates that the contractor would have everything up and running within 60 days of the contract, which means by the end of October. But what if the vaccines were never approved? Or what if they were approved much later, say in February, April or June? Was the CDC just going to hand over [redacted] millions of dollars to the contractor for nothing? Or did the CDC know something about the impending approval of COVID-19 vaccines? It certainly appears that by August, 2020, the impending emergency use authorization of at least one COVID-19 vaccine was a foregone conclusion.
BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin says that his mRNA vaccines rolled out in January this year (2021): Link here: https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-biontech-ceo-ugur-sahin-refuses-take-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-due-safety-concerns-61652 but by August 27, 2020 – The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020 had been let and the contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature and the CDC was already anticipating that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase), with a rate of serious adverse events that could be up to 8 times higher, (bearing in mind that VAERS represents only 1% of all injuries and deaths recorded and multiplying the numbers given by 41 (x41) gives a much better appreciation of just how many American’s were being injured or had died, after vaccinations began in early 2021), on a daily basis: see below
CDC Expected Huge Increase in VAERS Reporting
The contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature:
According to the contract, VAERS had been receiving an annual average of 53,000 reports in recent years, so in contracting for up to 1,000 reports per day, the CDC was already anticipating that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase), with a rate of serious adverse events that could be up to 8 times higher.
The initial total amount specified (with options) under the contract with Eagle Health Analytics was $5,925,388.58 or $7,077,054.90 “with all options” (which presumably includes the extension of the VAERS work through July). This amount also includes the CISA project assistance. However, it does not include the increased hours in the Oct. 29 revision, nor the increase for the V-SAFE pregnancy registry work. However, I have not been able to find the contract in any Federal contracts database. Perhaps one of my readers will have better luck.
How Much Did All of This Cost?
The amounts paid out under the contracts with General Dynamics were redacted. But according to this site, the initial amount paid was $9.45 million, with $4.4 million added in late February, and then an additional $16.3 million tacked on in early March. In March of 2022 there was an additional $5.2 million added, though it’s not clear for what since the contract had presumably expired by then. (Best guess is that General Dynamics continued some or all of its work on COVID VAERS reports with Eagle Health brought in for additional support.) Grand total? $35,425,642 of your taxpayer dollars.
So the next time somebody says that VAERS data is worthless, ask them why the Federal government paid contractors at least $45 million dollars over 2 years to maintain this “nationally critical function.”
An anonymous source has sent me (Josh Guetzkow) two key contracts obtained via FOIA between the CDC and two contractors hired to assist with COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring, including reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). “Assist” is not quite the right word, since the contracts essentially outsource VAERS maintenance and reporting for COVID-19 vaccines to these companies. Both contracts are embedded above, of this post.
The above information posted by Josh Guetzkow – which I happened to come across.
Question: There were no COVID-19 vaccines close to approval on August 27, 2020. In fact, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine trial phase 2/3 had only started a month earlier on July 27, but It certainly appears that by August, 2020, the impending emergency use authorization of at least one COVID-19 vaccine was a foregone conclusion - from January 2021
.
So the CDC knew that Covid-19 vaccines would cause approximately 1,000 injuries or deaths per day (x41), once they were released for public use – yet the mRNA vaccines went ahead anyway, care of Trump first and Biden later and no mention has been made of the 99% Graphene Oxide and nanotechnology in the Lipid packages, which were injected in their billions in each mRNA vaccine shot – so what do you think of the above – when you “volunteered” to be mRNA vaccinated, but now?
My take on this: But according to this site, the initial amount paid was $9.45 million, (with $4.4 million added in late February, and then an additional $16.3 million tacked on in early March. In March of 2022 there was an additional $5.2 million was added) is that as the numbers went up of records to be processed, so did the amount being paid for that recording to be done - what do you think?
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Friday updated its numbers showing a staggering 1,481,226 reports of adverse events (x41) following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 9, 2022. ...
All countries around the world have experienced similar trends to what America was recording, so it was hardly surprising that the deaths and injuries due to the synthetic mRNA vaccines would continue to go up, irrespective of which country they were being injected - the facts don't lie, how can they, only the people who said they were safe lied and now their lies have been caught out, agreed?
Yet more evidence that we are seeing a prepared epidemic response plan being implemented in service of an agenda other than health. The plan(demic) was triggered and will not be altered.
Safe and Effective Repost
It takes a stupid person to make a stupid rule,
And a fool to mind it.
Do not be a stupid.
Do not be a fool.
That is how to monkey wrench the COVID Jab Machine.
And any other Insanity Mechanism.
With covid waning, and the common cold becoming the winter bug it always was, why would anyone give a child an experimental biological, for a “virus” with a one in two million IFR? Over a million adverse events reported and thousands of death, VAERS CDC.
"WE" aren't vaccinating babies: you & all the other cowards would rather risk Every Baby in order to avoid taking on any adult responsibility.
The entire point of constitutional law is to prevent any small group of people ESPECIALLY elected leaders from having the power to mandate anything, ever. Those laws are still in place, 100% accessible to the public.
The mainstream news even reminded us all for two straight years that no one, not even the U.S. president is exempt from or above these laws. So what keeps you from using this social media forum to mount a legal, non-violent movement to amass public support too large for anyone to stop? Don't bring ME into this "Why are 'WE' vaccinating babies" crap!
I do not worship or fear a single scumbag corrupt politician. I have tried several times to enlist the help of you & thousands of others in an effort to do the above.
& every time YOU ALL back away from it. One can MILLIONS of you cowards to bomb babies overseas for any variety of excuses.
But not one of you will ACT to save One Child's Life if it means having to have a backbone.
Not even your own.
Well, this is how safe they have been for American adults and all other countries which rubber stamped the synthetic mRNA vaccines, which are patented, so we can expect the same results, probably for babies too: There were no COVID-19 vaccines close to approval on August 27, 2020. In fact, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine trial phase 2/3 had only started a month earlier on July 27.
The Initial Contract with General Dynamics
The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020. It outlines a series of services the company was to provide to the CDC pursuant to the “anticipated increase” in VAERS reports due to the COVID-19 vaccines.
There is no clause in the contract giving the CDC an option to cancel or suspend the contract in the event that vaccines would not be authorized. Also, the contract stipulates that the contractor would have everything up and running within 60 days of the contract, which means by the end of October. But what if the vaccines were never approved? Or what if they were approved much later, say in February, April or June? Was the CDC just going to hand over [redacted] millions of dollars to the contractor for nothing? Or did the CDC know something about the impending approval of COVID-19 vaccines? It certainly appears that by August, 2020, the impending emergency use authorization of at least one COVID-19 vaccine was a foregone conclusion.
BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin says that his mRNA vaccines rolled out in January this year (2021): Link here: https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-biontech-ceo-ugur-sahin-refuses-take-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-due-safety-concerns-61652 but by August 27, 2020 – The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020 had been let and the contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature and the CDC was already anticipating that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase), with a rate of serious adverse events that could be up to 8 times higher, (bearing in mind that VAERS represents only 1% of all injuries and deaths recorded and multiplying the numbers given by 41 (x41) gives a much better appreciation of just how many American’s were being injured or had died, after vaccinations began in early 2021), on a daily basis: see below
CDC Expected Huge Increase in VAERS Reporting
The contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature:
According to the contract, VAERS had been receiving an annual average of 53,000 reports in recent years, so in contracting for up to 1,000 reports per day, the CDC was already anticipating that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase), with a rate of serious adverse events that could be up to 8 times higher.
The initial total amount specified (with options) under the contract with Eagle Health Analytics was $5,925,388.58 or $7,077,054.90 “with all options” (which presumably includes the extension of the VAERS work through July). This amount also includes the CISA project assistance. However, it does not include the increased hours in the Oct. 29 revision, nor the increase for the V-SAFE pregnancy registry work. However, I have not been able to find the contract in any Federal contracts database. Perhaps one of my readers will have better luck.
How Much Did All of This Cost?
The amounts paid out under the contracts with General Dynamics were redacted. But according to this site, the initial amount paid was $9.45 million, with $4.4 million added in late February, and then an additional $16.3 million tacked on in early March. In March of 2022 there was an additional $5.2 million added, though it’s not clear for what since the contract had presumably expired by then. (Best guess is that General Dynamics continued some or all of its work on COVID VAERS reports with Eagle Health brought in for additional support.) Grand total? $35,425,642 of your taxpayer dollars.
So the next time somebody says that VAERS data is worthless, ask them why the Federal government paid contractors at least $45 million dollars over 2 years to maintain this “nationally critical function.”
The Contracts
23 00099 General Dynamics Information Te...
https://substack.com/redirect/dac78dc8-9d2d-4280-a390-218d47bb331d?j=eyJ1IjoibjFlaXcifQ.OkComRnvTz45cW2ospKdwvhGbhkMepFwvepUF91fYF0
23 00099 Eagle Health Analytics, Ll
https://substack.com/redirect/bcba05ff-1dce-4b15-a6a7-0f59f3cb115a?j=eyJ1IjoibjFlaXcifQ.OkComRnvTz45cW2ospKdwvhGbhkMepFwvepUF91fYF0
An anonymous source has sent me (Josh Guetzkow) two key contracts obtained via FOIA between the CDC and two contractors hired to assist with COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring, including reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). “Assist” is not quite the right word, since the contracts essentially outsource VAERS maintenance and reporting for COVID-19 vaccines to these companies. Both contracts are embedded above, of this post.
The above information posted by Josh Guetzkow – which I happened to come across.
Question: There were no COVID-19 vaccines close to approval on August 27, 2020. In fact, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine trial phase 2/3 had only started a month earlier on July 27, but It certainly appears that by August, 2020, the impending emergency use authorization of at least one COVID-19 vaccine was a foregone conclusion - from January 2021
.
So the CDC knew that Covid-19 vaccines would cause approximately 1,000 injuries or deaths per day (x41), once they were released for public use – yet the mRNA vaccines went ahead anyway, care of Trump first and Biden later and no mention has been made of the 99% Graphene Oxide and nanotechnology in the Lipid packages, which were injected in their billions in each mRNA vaccine shot – so what do you think of the above – when you “volunteered” to be mRNA vaccinated, but now?
My take on this: But according to this site, the initial amount paid was $9.45 million, (with $4.4 million added in late February, and then an additional $16.3 million tacked on in early March. In March of 2022 there was an additional $5.2 million was added) is that as the numbers went up of records to be processed, so did the amount being paid for that recording to be done - what do you think?
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Friday updated its numbers showing a staggering 1,481,226 reports of adverse events (x41) following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 9, 2022. ...
All countries around the world have experienced similar trends to what America was recording, so it was hardly surprising that the deaths and injuries due to the synthetic mRNA vaccines would continue to go up, irrespective of which country they were being injected - the facts don't lie, how can they, only the people who said they were safe lied and now their lies have been caught out, agreed?
I cant believe they want to start this experiment on children now
We lost a young and healthy friend after the second jab (myocarditis)
They are vaccinating babies because it makes money. Loot is the goal, period. #FollowTheMoney
Short answer: To kill them.
“They” are exceedingly stupid and they think we are too!
Yet more evidence that we are seeing a prepared epidemic response plan being implemented in service of an agenda other than health. The plan(demic) was triggered and will not be altered.