WHO controls the world - or will do if you let them (2)
PETITION Write to your MP
The important DUP MP Sammy Wilson is one of the Co-Chairs of the All Party Group in Westminster reviewing the government’s response to the pandemic. For N.Ireland readers, his office is in Larne and he would welcome your support. He has been an outspoken critic of many government Covid policies.
If you are thinking it is all behind us—-here is a selection of RECENT headlines.
You should have just received a Petition
“We need more many to plan for the second pandemic, there’s gonna be another pandemic, we have to think ahead” Joe Biden
China Announces Lockdown Plans for the Flu as Washington Post Tells Americans to Prepare for the Same
Primary school closes after Covid outbreak
“Despite widespread evidence to the contrary the WHO is still promoting the concept of asymptomatic transmission”
“Massive media push to promote bird flu as the next pandemic – oh, and there’s a vaxx for that
“Vaccine makers say they're 'standing ready' for human bird flu pandemic: Moderna, GSK and CSL Seqirus all prepare to roll out H5N1 shots as fears mount about zoonotic spillover”
“Despite Years of Failure, WHO Unbelievably Recommends Permanent Masking,”
“Why Is an NHS Mental Health Trust Insisting on Mandatory Masking?”
LEST WE FORGET
Were you really not meant to hug your sister, who had been depressed, or your cousin, recently bereaved? Were you really not allowed to visit your wife of 50 years in her care home or hold the hand of your father dying alone in hospital? Were you really not allowed to enjoy a walk in the rolling because it was more than 5 miles from your home. Why were my business closed, my children denied education, my baby surrounded by fear engendering mask wearers, my relative buried alone. Coerced me into having an injection or lose my job?
And even more importantly, were GPs really instructed to close their surgery door. And as for churches being closed to the lonely and fearful, those in need of spiritual support.?
JAMES ROGUSKI—-check out his substack for some good videos on the subject.
Article 59 was signed off at the May 2022 WHO meeting. It needs to be rejected before November 2023 or it is binding.
https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_R12-en.pdf
"Article 59: Entry into force; period for rejection or reservations"
Please realize that 194 unelected, unaccountable and largely unknown “delegates” to the yearly World Health Assembly have the power to agree to adopt amendments to the International Health Regulations and THEIR DECISION DOES NOT REQUIRE A PRESIDENTIAL SIGNATURE, NOR DOES IT REQUIRE THE ADVICE AND CONSENT OF 2/3 OF THE SENATE.
This situation is not right, and it must be changed, but it is the current reality, so we must stand up, speak up and push back against it.
Despite my efforts, the global propaganda machine has mostly succeeded in diverting nearly everyone’s attention away from the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations by getting most people to focus on the proposed WHO CA+ (“Pandemic Treaty”).
Unfortunately, even the people who are opposed to the globalist’s efforts to empower the World Health Organization have been mostly silent regarding the fact that…
AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS WERE ADOPTED ON MAY 27, 2022.
All that is required for any member nation to reject the amendments that were adopted last year is a simple letter from their president or prime minister to the WHO stating that their nation wishes to REJECT the amendments.
Every nation on earth still has until late November 2023 to stand up to the World Health Organization and REJECT the amendments that were adopted on May 27, 2022, but first they have to be made aware that the International Health Regulations WERE CHANGED, and they also need to realize that THE AMENDMENTS CAN BE REJECTED!
WHY HAS EVERYONE BEEN SO SILENT ABOUT THIS!?
1 We should be very worried--note the extra-territorial powers. What is the party's position on this?
International Health Regulations. Draft Amendments:
· Expand the definitions of pandemics and health emergencies, including the introduction of ‘potential’ for harm rather than actual harm. It also expands the definition of health products that fall under this to include any commodity or process that may impact on the response or “improve quality of life”.
· Change the recommendations of the IHR from ‘non-binding’ to mandatory instructions that the States undertake to follow and implement.
· Solidify the Director General’s (DG’s) ability to independently declare emergencies.
· Set up an extensive surveillance process in all States, which WHO will verify regularly through a country review mechanism.
· Enable WHO to share country data without consent.
· Give WHO control over certain country resources, including requirements for financial contributions, and provision of intellectual property and know-how (within the broad definition of health products above).
· Ensure national support for promotion of censorship activities by WHO to prevent contrary approaches and concerns from being freely disseminated.
· Change existing IHR provisions affecting individuals from non-binding to binding, including border closures, travel restrictions, confinement (quarantine), medical examinations and medication of individuals. The latter would encompass requirements for injection with vaccines or other pharmaceuticals.
2. CA+ (treaty):
· Set up an international supply network overseen by WHO.
· Fund the structures and processes by requiring ≥5% of national health budgets to be devoted to health emergencies.
· Set up a ‘Governing Body’, under the auspices of WHO, to oversee the whole process.
· Expand scope by emphasising a ‘One Health’ agenda, defined as a recognition that a very broad range of aspects of life and the biosphere can impact health, and therefore fall under the ‘potential’ to spread harm across borders as an international health emergency.